Governata turns measurement, rule, and remediation results into documented reports showing the quality level, how it has moved, and the effect of the actions your organization took.
Quality level
Rule results
Trend over time
Remediation impact
Ready to present
A team works for months improving the data, then cannot show what changed in a form a decision maker understands.
A report is not an assembly of numbers. It is evidence of what changed and why it changed.
Presenting the overall data quality score and its distribution across quality dimensions.
Showing how quality rules performed, their compliance rates, and failing record counts.
Comparing the current level against earlier periods to show the direction of performance.
Tying improvement in the indicator to the corrective actions taken, showing which of them worked.
Showing the quality level broken down across the different data sources in your organization.
Reports suitable for senior management and regulators without being rewritten.
Collecting quality measurement results and rule execution results for the defined period.
Comparing the current level against earlier periods to establish the direction.
Relating movement in the indicator to the remediation actions carried out.
Presenting the report to the relevant parties and saving it as a reference for later comparison.
Proving the impact of the quality program to senior management in numbers rather than description.
A periodic reference showing the effect of applied policies and directing the next period’s priorities.
A ready report representing the organization’s data quality position at any regulatory review.
A picture of the effect of their remediation work, and which areas still need intervention.
The current data quality level across your organization, as a rate and as a count.
Which dimension, source, and table are pulling the quality level down.
The direction of the indicator against earlier periods, upward or downward.
The remediation actions taken during the period and the status of each.
To document the level of data quality, how it has moved, and the effect of the actions taken, in a form that can be presented and compared.
A dashboard shows the current state for day to day monitoring. A report documents a period and compares it to what came before, and is meant to be presented and kept.
Because a figure on its own says little. A quality rate takes its meaning from comparison with what it was.
By tying improvement in the indicator to the actions carried out in the same period, showing which of them worked and which did not.
Senior management, who need the overall picture, and governance teams, who need the operational detail to direct their work.
The organization decides according to its needs, and regular intervals matter more than frequency, because they make comparison possible.
Quality level, rule results, movement over time, and remediation impact, in one comparable report.